Fertility Success Rates

Why doesn’t SART Want You To Compare Success Rates Among Clinics?

Censored IVF Success RatesDo you know that the largest group of fertility clinics in the United States doesn’t want you to compare their IVF success rates? This organization, SART, actually restricts member clinics from comparing their own success rates to other clinics or even to the National Average.

There should be a variety of factors that go into making an educated decision concerning fertility treatment. Why would this powerful group want to keep such an important piece of data out of that equation?

Continue reading Why doesn’t SART Want You To Compare Success Rates Among Clinics?

SART Is Trying to Shut Us Down For Comparing IVF Success Rates

Note: This post is intended for physicians and other professionals working in the fertility industry.

Every year, SART makes a big push to contact fertility clinics listed on this website in an effort to scare them away from advertising or even linking here. They cite their advertising policy which prohibits “advertising/marketing that ranks or compares clinics or practices.”

They want to put us out of business.

I’ve already written about why I think IVF success rate data should be free from this restriction, so I won’t reiterate that here.

Instead, I’d like to focus on the futility and oppressiveness of SART’s continued attacks on this website.

Continue reading SART Is Trying to Shut Us Down For Comparing IVF Success Rates

How (not) To Report Inaccurate IVF Success Rate Data

In any given year, approximately 50% of the IVF clinics that report to SART don’t like this site. We take a lot of heat from some of these clinics. We didn’t create this site for them.

This site was conceived and continues to operate for the benefit of patients who are confused about the data contained in the public reports published by SART and the CDC. Live Birth Rate Per Transfer certainly should NOT be the sole factor in choosing where to pursue fertility treatment, but it does give patients somewhere to start in a deeper examination of all of the available data.

Continue reading How (not) To Report Inaccurate IVF Success Rate Data

Rank Update February 25th, 2014

The Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology has updated their annual IVF Success Rate report to include six centers that were unintentionally excluded from the initial report released 02/17/2014.

None of these new entries affects our comparative report of the Top 25 IVF Clinics in America.

Rankings at the state level, however, have been adjusted accordingly.

Continue reading Rank Update February 25th, 2014

2012 IVF Success Rate Data Released

The latest IVF Success Rates report is now available!

http://fertilitysuccessrates.com/report/United-States/women-under-35/data.html

The data in our comparative report comes directly from the Society For Assisted Reproductive Technology.

The new report shows a total of 165,172 cycles were reported by member clinics in 2012. The national average live birth per embryo transferred for women under the age of 35 was 47.1. Compare this to the top 25 clinics in the same age group where live birth rate is 82.4% – 62.5% and you start to see the difference between truly excellent and just average.

Continue reading 2012 IVF Success Rate Data Released

Rank Updates Feb. 5, 2013

SART has updated their IVF Success Rate data to include new clinics. Accordingly, we have update our Top IVF Clinic Report to include this new data.

The following clinic were added:

Austin Fertility Institute, PA
Utah Fertility Center
Fertility Solutions, P.C. / Massachutsetts Fertility Center, L.L.C.
Gago IVF
Reproductive Gynecology, Inc.

Both Austin Fertility Institute and Utah Fertility Center now appear in the Top IVF Clinics in the United States for Women Under 35. As a result, two clinics that were previously listed in that report are now not. No other age groups were affected for the United States report.

2011 SART Data Has Been Released

SART has released the 2011 IVF Success Rates data and we have updated our list of Top IVF Clinics.

However, we noticed that the reports for several clinics were not yet updated for 2011. 

https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=2268

https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=2454

https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=2143

https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=2455

https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=2210

We have excluded these clinics from our report of Top IVF Clinics in America until their data has been updated with SART.

Updates to 2010 IVF Success Data

Yesterday it was brought to our attention that SART updated their 2010 IVF Success Rates Report. It is not uncommon for them to do this periodically as corrections are made to the initial reporting. SART does not have a system in place to notify the public when such changes are made, so we are unsure when this new data was introduced.

In order to maintain the integrity of our index, we moved swiftly to identify the changes and incorporate them into our site.

Continue reading Updates to 2010 IVF Success Data

Internet Marketing For Fertility Clinics Increase new patient consultations.
Learn More Here.

Of Interest…